Share this post
FaceBook  Twitter  
Powdthavee and Riyanto ask "Why do people pay for useless advice?" in their discussion paper on "Implications of gambler's and hot-hand fallacies in false-expert setting". They test whether people are fooled by random sequences into believing that an expert is making valid predictions and, consistently with the seer-sucker theory, they find the answer is "yes". Their paper is available here.